Mission and Research: Difference between revisions

From RedwoodCenter
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 33: Line 33:
There is an intriguing parallel between multiple nested levels of brain activity and the multi-scale structure of sensory data. Is is conceivable that different scales of structure in sensory data are processed not only at different levels of the [cortical hierarchy] but also at different levels of brain activity as described in this paragraph.
There is an intriguing parallel between multiple nested levels of brain activity and the multi-scale structure of sensory data. Is is conceivable that different scales of structure in sensory data are processed not only at different levels of the [cortical hierarchy] but also at different levels of brain activity as described in this paragraph.


== Sensori-motor loops ==
== Active perception and sensorimotor loops ==
 
Perception is an active process. During natural vision for example, our eyes are constantly moving even while we are fixating an object. Additionally, active brain processes such as attention always influence the processing of sensory information. Active action and perception operate in a loop, called sensorimotor loop.
 
Some changes of the sensory input are caused by changes in the outside world while other changes are due to our own actions and the brain has to be able to distinguish between these two possibilities. We have seen that our brain is able to extract [[invariances]] form sensory data that correspond to objects in the world and in a theory of active perception these are invariances in sensorimotor space rather than in pure sensory space. We are interested in the [[learning]] of these so-called sensorimotor contingencies and how they are used during active perception.

Revision as of 19:29, 31 October 2005

Sparse representation

Hierarchical representation and feedback

Natural scene statistics

Invariance

Learning

Associative memory

Exploratory data analysis

Single-cell/network/biophysical models

Multiscale interactions and oscillations

Brain activity can be described at various levels of complexity. The neuron level in which single neurons constitute the fundamental computational units is the most common level of computational theories of sensory perception. However, some theories of plasticity and learning are formulated on the level of individual synapses and theories of cognitive functions like decision making and attention operate on the level of neuron populations.

Both the neuron level and the population level are directly accessible to electro-physiological measurements. On the neuron level, activity can be recorded using single or multiple electrodes and is best described in terms of the point process of spike timings of individual cells. The activity of many neurons gives rise to population activity which can be measured in the form of local field potentials or activity in the Electro-Corticogram (ECoG) or Electro-Encephalogram (EEG). This population activity is a continuous signal extended in space and time and often has oscillatory properties.

In addition to the study of individual levels of neural activity, it is crucial to understand how different levels interact: We would like to understand how the spiking activity of individual neurons gives rise to population activity and how in turn the population activity influences the response properties of individual neurons.

There is an intriguing parallel between multiple nested levels of brain activity and the multi-scale structure of sensory data. Is is conceivable that different scales of structure in sensory data are processed not only at different levels of the [cortical hierarchy] but also at different levels of brain activity as described in this paragraph.

Active perception and sensorimotor loops

Perception is an active process. During natural vision for example, our eyes are constantly moving even while we are fixating an object. Additionally, active brain processes such as attention always influence the processing of sensory information. Active action and perception operate in a loop, called sensorimotor loop.

Some changes of the sensory input are caused by changes in the outside world while other changes are due to our own actions and the brain has to be able to distinguish between these two possibilities. We have seen that our brain is able to extract invariances form sensory data that correspond to objects in the world and in a theory of active perception these are invariances in sensorimotor space rather than in pure sensory space. We are interested in the learning of these so-called sensorimotor contingencies and how they are used during active perception.